Tag Archives: Weekly Gallery Chat

Gallery Chat – Illuminated Manuscripts


” A Pale Green Mermaid Blog “



Let’s take a look at a few illuminated  manuscripts,










Is there any project that you have taken years to produce /create?

What is the value in spending one’s time in the creative process?

Pick a category of art production and take one month to complete the project…


FROM Wikipedia – Illuminated manuscripts, 

In the strictest definition of illuminated manuscript, only manuscripts with gold or silver, like this miniature of Christ in Majesty from the Aberdeen Bestiary (folio 4v), would be considered illuminated.

An illuminated manuscript is a manuscript in which the text is supplemented by the addition of decoration, such as decorated initials, borders (marginalia) and miniature illustrations. In the strictest definition of the term, an illuminated manuscript only refers to manuscripts decorated with gold or silver, but in both common usage and modern scholarship, the term is now used to refer to any decorated or illustrated manuscript from the Western traditions. Comparable Far Eastern works are always described as painted, as are Mesoamerican works. Islamic manuscripts are usually referred to as illuminated but can also be classified as painted.

Leave a comment

Filed under Art

A Painter – Gauguin

 ” A Pale Green Mermaid Blog “


Paul Gauguin’s work was a precursor to abstract art – see how he uses flat planes of sharp color to mold a figure and show its volume.  His use of artifact like symbols gleaned from the world that surrounded him adds another dimension to his painting.

If you want to paint and are not yet interested in taking classes, you can paint a copy of a painting by an artist you admire.  IHistorically this has been standard practice, used to hone skills.  I have painted Gauguin copies and one mural of his work, through this method you will see parts of the painting that are not privy to the casual viewer.


Take a shot at it you might surprise yourself…

 Happy Friday!


Self portrait by Mr. Gauguin,

gauguin-vangogh.jpg Gaugin-Van-Gogh image by pussycat37

Art requires philosophy, just as philosophy requires art. Otherwise, what would become of beauty?

Paul Gauguin


Images Courtesy of Google

Leave a comment

Filed under Art, Friday Night Gallery Chat

Weekly Gallery Chat – Cyanotypes

” A Pale Green Mermaid Blog “


Cyanotypes were used in the early days of photography, they are a blue (cyan) based form of  photography common in the 1800’s. The process today, is sometimes used in blueprints for architectural /engineering purposes.

Using blueprint paper and an ammonia ( very toxic) fume process you can produce stark images. I  have used the technique and it is easy and fun although the fume issue is not to be taken lightly. 

Using the sun as your source of light that will strike the emulsion on the blueprint paper, (when I work with this process I do everything outside), you get a shadow image but with detail in and around the object.

Below is a series of prints by Anna Atkins, a pioneer in this technique and photography,

Have a blue tinted night!

From Wikipedia below,


Anna Atkins algae

Cyanotype is a photographic printing process that gives a cyan-blue print. The process was popular in engineering circles well into the 20th century. The simple and low-cost process enabled them to produce large-scale copies of their work, referred to as blueprints. Two chemicals are used in the process:


The English scientist and astronomer Sir John Herschel discovered this procedure in 1842.[1] Even though John Herschel is perhaps the inventor of the cyanotype process, Anna Atkins actually brought this to photography. She created a limited series of cyanotype books that documented ferns and other plant life. By using this process, Anna Atkins is regarded as the first female photographer[2].


Images Courtesy of Google

Leave a comment

Filed under Weekly Gallery Chat

A Painter – Michelangelo

” A Pale Green Mermaid Blog “ 









The Sistine  chapel ceiling that Michelangelo painted had become so dirty that the figures were  practically hidden under a layer of grime – above a before cleaning and after cleaning example.

The  elegance and nonchalant grace of his figures portrays a skill level in painting that few achieve – what made his work dense artistically is his use of color and sculpture infused muscle rendering.

Have  eye-catching night!

From Wikipedia below,

Michelangelo di Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni

Born 6 March 1475(1475-03-06)
Arezzo, in Caprese, Tuscany
Died 18 February 1564 (aged 88)



Leave a comment

Filed under Art, Weekly Gallery Chat

A Painter – Van Gogh

” A Pale Green Mermaid Blog “


Vincent Willem Van Gogh


















All of Van Gogh’s paintings were created in ” Plein Air” meaning that he painted outside , from real life.


I dream of painting and then I paint my dream.

Great things are done by a series of small things brought together.
Vincent Van Gogh

30 March 1853 (1853-03-30)
Zundert, Netherlands
Died 29 July 1890 (1890-07-30) (aged 37)
Auvers-sur-Oise, France


Images Courtesy Of Google

Quotes from  www.brainyquote.com

Leave a comment

Filed under Art

Weekly Gallery Chat Says GoodBye To King Tut’s Tomb


” A Pale Green Mermaid Blog “


As we bid a fond farewell to King Tut’s tomb let us take a look back at some of the items  not discussed and read a final warning to all who spend their time discovering…

( Look for me in the Yucatan peninsula in about 5 years  – I know there is an undiscovered mayan pyramid yet… to be found…I am dead serious…)






Egypt Feature Story below  from  www.touregypt.net

Politics and the King Tut Discovery

by Jimmy Dunn

Howard Carter, Pierre Lacau and members of the Egyptian government in front of the tomb of Seti II Politics have always taken an important part in Egyptian archaeology, as they continue to do today. As we gaze upon the wonders of the Tutankhamun treasures, it should come as no big surprise that politics also played a big part in that discovery, becoming in fact the real curse of King Tut’s tomb.

In general, many of the worlds greatest scholars, even today, are not some of the world’s greatest politicians, even though their work often comes under political scrutiny. This can also be said about Howard Carter, so the death of his financier and the more politically savvy Lord Carnarvon on April 5, 1923 could not have come at a worst time. Afterwards, irregardless of how proficient Howard Carter was as an excavator, he proved to be a very poor diplomat at a time when the whole Tut Article from The Times of Londontomb affair had become a very tricky political situation.

The disaster was actually initiated by Lord Carnarvon himself when, on January 9th, 1923, he signed a contract with The Times of London, giving them exclusive rights to the details of the Tutankhamun discovery. It seemed like a good idea at the time, both financially and practically, but in reality it turned out otherwise. First of all, the agreement with The Times was felt to be an affront by not only the news media in Egypt, but the news media throughout the rest of the world as well. One must always keep in mind that this was a time of limited media, before the age of television, radio and the numerous media that so impact our world today. Thereafter, Howard Carter and his team had to suffer what might be called guerilla warfare and general mischief making from the desperate Time’s competitors. One of them, the Daily Mail, even employed one of Carters old rivals, Arthur Weigall, as their special correspondent.

According to Aruther Mace, a member of the Tutankhamun excavation team, in a letter to his wife Winifred:

“…the atmosphere of Luxor is rather nerve-wracking at present. The Winter Palace is a scream. No one talks of anything but the tomb, newspaper men swarm, and you daren’t say a word without looking round everywhere to see if anyone is listening. Some of them are trying to make mischief between Carnarvon and the Department of Antiquities, and all Luxor takes sides on way or the other. Archaeology plus journalism is bad enough, but when you add Politics it becomes a little to much…”

Furthermore, this was a difficult time in Egypt. There was a serious and growing movement for an independent Egyptian state, even though it would take another three decades to achieve. For those involved in the movement, known as Nationalists, the Times agreement provided a big Artical from a competing newspaper of the timesstick with which to beat not only the British “colonialists”, but foreigners in general. It would eventually result in the Tut expedition’s undoing, at least for a while.

After the official “discovery” of the tomb on February 16, 1923, and the revelation that the boy king laid undisturbed within his tomb, there was a growing pressure to make the find public. There was also the legal question of the treasure’s division. If the tomb was classified as “intact”, the Egyptian Government would, under the terms of the concession, be entitled to deny the excavators’ claims to any share of the objects that were recovered.

Indeed, the issue of how best to deal with the discovery created difficulties between Carter and Carnarvon which ultimately resulted in a falling out between the two men. On February 23rd, 1923, Carter went so far as to demand that Carnarvon never enter his house again. Yet, that did not prevent the cloud of doom that fell over the expedition camp following Lord Carnarvon‘s death some months later. Lord Carnarvon had not only been their sponsor, but an influential one as well.

Howard Carter and Lord Carnarvon in the tombBetween the first and second excavation season, Carter spend the summer in England, where he managed to persuade Lady Carnarvon to renew the concession under her own name. She readily agreed to this, but she also renewed the Times contract which had been the cause of so much grief the previous season.

By October of 1923, Carter was back in Egypt to begin his second season at the tomb, but thanks to his poor handling of the political situation, even more problems would arise this season. It began when Carter, with a clear aim of circumventing a call from journalists that all or none be present when an announcement on the find was made, decided that Merton, the Time’s correspondent, would no longer be regarded as a journalist but as a member of the excavation team. Hence, the Times would still get the news first.

At the same time, the Egyptian Government, and in particular Pierre Lacau who was now the Director General of the Antiquities Service, had been under increasing pressure to take action over the Times monopoly, especially by the Nationalists who resented considerably the lack of Egyptian involvement in the Tut excavation. At the time, a sound political move would have been for Carter to immediately brief the Egyptian press, which would have probably gone a long way in smoothing over the situation. Yet stubbornly, Carter refused to budge on the matter. It would not take long for the tension between Carter and Lacau to escalate into downright unpleasantness.

Matters finally came to a head following the official lifting of the sarcophagus lid on February 12th, 1924. Carter intended to allow the wives of the expedition members to visit the tomb the following day. However, this was thwarted by the newly appointed Nationalist Minister of Public Works, Morcos Bey Hanna. Hanna was certainly no friend of the English, who had attempted to have him hanged for his political activities some years before, and Carter could see nothing in the Minister’s action except a personal affront to himself, his colleagues and to England. On the other hand, Mace, one of Carter’s principal team members, simply saw it as petty jealousy, “spoiling the dream of every Egyptologist”.

In a letter to his mother, Winifred Mace remarked:

“The whole is a disagreeable business and Carter is such an autocrat that to be thwarted at every turn takes all reason from him.”

Thus, “looking desperately ill and in a fury”, Carter carried out an earlier threat and closed the tomb, leaving the sarcophagus lid hanging precariously by its ropes. He then posted a notice in A pamphlet privately printed by Howard Carterthe lobby of the Winter Palace in Luxor explaining the reason for his actions:

“Owing to the impossible restrictions and discourtesies of the Egyptian Public Works Department and its antiquity service, all my collaborators, as a protest, have refused to work any further upon their scientific investigations in the tomb”.

That was Howard Carter‘s biggest mistake. By closing the tomb, he had played into Lacau’s hands, violating the terms of his concession and allowing Lacau to void the agreement. Afterwards, the Egyptian Government declared that it would finish the work. Legal action on the part of Carter to re-establish the concession came to nothing, and he, fuming with indignation and frustration at having been so completely outmaneuvered, soon left for England and an American lecture tour.

Meanwhile, in Egypt things when from bad to worst, with the discovery of a gessoed wooden head of the boy king packed as if ready to be shipped out of the country. Furthermore, Carter privately published a pamphlet containing “a full statement of the facts which have led us to the present position with the Egyptian government”. One of the appendices removed by Carter from many copies of the booklet contained embarrassing transcripts of Herbert Winlock’s coded telegrams and letters warning Carter of problems. The printing of this ill-judged pamphlet cost Carter the support of many friends and allies.

Were it not for the terrorist murder of the British Sirdar, Sir Lee Stack, on November 19th, Carter might very well have never returned to Egypt. Afterwards, the British tightened their control over Egypt, which included disbanding the Nationalist Government, which allowed Carter to return to his excavation, though now on Egyptian terms.

Howard Carter Working in the Tomb of TutankhamunHe received the new concession, still in Lady Carnarvon’s name, on January 13th, 1925. Under the new agreement, The Times of London would loose its monopoly on the discovery news, and the Carnarvon estate, despite vague promises of one or two duplicates when the tomb had been fully cleared, was required to abandon any formal claim to the king’s treasures. As compensation for the expenses incurred during the excavation, the Carnarvon estate was given the sum of 36,000 pounds sterling in 1930, which marked the end of the Carnarvon financial commitment to the excavation. The final seasons would be financed by the Egyptian government and by Howard Carter himself.

In the end, there was considerable relief when Carter took back the excavation, even by Lacau. It was a monumental task, and as Winlock remarked, “there is no better person to whom this dedicated stuff could have been entrusted”. While Carter may not have been a good politician, he was unquestionably a great excavator, and in truth, it was a job that no one else wanted. Work on clearing the tomb and conserving the objects would continue for  more than seven years, and the study of its contents and preparation for publication would hang as a burden around Carter’s neck for the rest of his life.



Adieu King Tutankhamun

Leave a comment

Filed under Egypt

Weekly Gallery Chat – David Hockney

” A Pale Green Mermaid Blog “


David Hockney’s spacious sunlit clear tableaus always left a question mark in the viewers mind…who lived there…where were they …what had just happened in those pool filled  landscapes?





He  easily captures the heat filled California afternoon, still there is something else that lingers waiting,


A series of ethereally common experiences of life, a slice of quiet knowing cloudscape that portends death and life simultaneously,



Summers just a breath away…


(where or where is that itsy, bitsy, tinnie, winnie, yellow  polka dot bikini , of mine???)


Happy Friday!




Check out his photography as well!



David Hockney
We Two Boys Together Clinging (1961)
Born 9 July 1937 (1937-07-09) (age 72)
Bradford, England
Nationality English
Field Painting, Set design, Photography
Movement Pop art

David Hockney, CH, RA, (born 9 July, 1937) is an English painter, draughtsman, printmaker, stage designer and photographer, who is based in Bridlington, Yorkshire, although he also maintains a base in London. An important contributor to the Pop art movement of the 1960s, he is considered one of the most influential British artists of the twentieth century.[1



Leave a comment

Filed under Weekly Gallery Chat