” A Pale Green Mermaid Blog “
The eternal question amongst modern-day artists of all kinds. The writing group I lurk in, because I don’t have anything smart enough to say yet, had a discussion about this and Studio 360, a fab radio art talk station was also talking about this dilemma so, thought I’d put my 2 cents into the mix!
Art is anything that comes from a connection to the artist’s spiritual introspection.
For example an artist filled up a dump truck with stuffed toys
another artist entered a urinal with a fake signature into a show
Why because one was done for sensationalism and the other was done / created, after introspection about the effects of war on society and the pain and confusion it produces. A manifesto ( artist talking points about their theories) was written and the artist tried to follow a line of thinking, a curve of expression that depicted that confusion/pain and it’s effects on everyday life.
So there it is my nutshell take on ART and art!
What do you think?
The other thing about art is everyone can say whatever they think about a piece but the only true person who knows is the artist and even then a part of art/creation is always mysterious, unknown even to the artist.
What is Dada?
Why this 1916-1923 “non-art movement” still matters in the art world
Dada was, officially, not a movement, its artists not artists and its art not art. That sounds easy enough, doesn’t it? Of course, there is a bit more to the story of Dadaism than this simplistic explanation.
Dada was a literary and artistic movement born in Europe at a time when the horror of World War I was being played out in what amounted to citizens’ front yards. Due to the war, a number of artists, writers and intellectuals — notably of French and German nationality — found themselves congregating in the refuge that Zurich (in neutral Switzerland) offered. Far from merely feeling relief at their respective escapes, this bunch was pretty ticked off that modern European society would allow the war to have happened. They were so angry, in fact, that they undertook the time-honored artistic tradition of protesting.
The original Fountain by Marcel Duchamp, 1917, photographed by Alfred Stieglitz at the 291 (Art Gallery) after the 1917 Society of Independent Artists exhibit. Stieglitz used a backdrop of The Warriors by Marsden Hartley to photograph the urinal. The exhibition entry tag can be clearly seen.
Below From http://www.wikipedia.org
Fountain is a 1917 work widely attributed to Marcel Duchamp. The scandalous work was a porcelain urinal, which was signed “R.Mutt” and titled Fountain. Submitted for the exhibition of the Society of Independent Artists in 1917, Fountain was rejected by the committee, even though the rules stated that all works would be accepted from artists who paid the fee.
Below from http://www.wikipedia.org –
Birth nameHenri-Robert-Marcel DuchampBorn28 July 1887
Blainville-Crevon, FranceDied2 October 1968 (aged 81)
Neuilly-sur-Seine, FranceNationalityFrench, became a U.S. citizen in 1955FieldPainting, sculpture, filmMovementDada, SurrealismWorksNude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 (1912)
The Bride Stripped Bare By Her Bachelors, Even (1915–23)
Étant donnés (1946–66)
Below from –Wikisource –
Dada Manifesto (1918, Tristan Tzara)
The text (partial)of the Dada Manifesto, written in 1918. It is one of the most important texts regarding Dadaism.
Dada Manifesto by Tristan Tzara, March 23 1918
The magic of a word – DADA – which for journalists has opened the door to an unforeseen world, has for us not the slightest importance.
To launch a manifesto you have to want: A.B. & C., and fulminate against 1, 2, & 3,
work yourself up and sharpen your wings to conquer and circulate lower and upper case As, Bs & Cs, sign, shout, swear, organise prose into a form that is absolutely and irrefutably obvious, prove its ne plus ultra and maintain that novelty resembles life in the same way as the latest apparition of a harlot proves the essence of God. His existence had already been proved by the accordion, the landscape and soft words. * To impose one’s A.B.C. is only natural – and therefore regrettable. Everyone does it in the form of a crystalbluff-madonna, or a monetary system, or pharmaceutical preparations, a naked leg being the invitation to an ardent and sterile Spring. The love of novelty is a pleasant sort of cross, it’s evidence of a naive don’t-give-a-damn attitude, a passing, positive, sign without rhyme or reason. But this need is out of date, too. By giving art the impetus of supreme simplicity – novelty – we are being human and true in relation to innocent pleasures; impulsive and vibrant in order to crucify boredom. At the lighted crossroads, alert, attentive, lying in wait for years, in the forest. * I am writing a manifesto and there’s nothing I want, and yet I’m saying certain things, and in principle I am against manifestos, as I am against principles (quantifying measures of the moral value of every phrase – too easy; approximation was invested by the impressionists). *
I’m writing this manifesto to show that you can perform contrary actions at the same time, in one single, fresh breath; I am against action; as for continual contradiction, and affirmation too, I am neither for nor against them, and I won’t explain myself because I hate common sense.
Go to the website to finish reading the manifeato it will be worth it and you will never look at art in the same way again…..it is not a simple thing.
Have a Da Da esque Wednesday!